Your Cart
Loading

Pros and Cons: Art Prints vs Posters

You may have noticed that many of my art prints are also available as poster versions. Initially, I set out to only create art prints, but after a few requests for more size options, I started looking into a different type of paper that would be more economical at larger sizes. I’ve run print tests on all my color schemes for both the art prints and posters, and I absolutely love how they look. They both support vibrant colors, which is great since many of my color schemes are bright and colorful, but each has its place depending on your needs. If you’re undecided about which paper type is right for you, here’s an overview of the features as well as pros and cons of each.

Art Prints

Fine art prints are generally designed to be long lasting. Giclee prints, like the art prints I sell here, use archival-based materials in both the paper and inks used to create the print. The paper I’ve chosen is a cotton-based paper, which is acid-free, meaning it general won’t fade or degrade over time. The inks used to spray the artwork onto the paper are pigment-based instead of dye-based inks, which again prevents deterioration.


Since art prints use higher quality, archival-based materials, they’re meant to last longer and resist fading over time. This higher quality costs more, though, especially if you’re looking for a print that’s 16x20 or larger. I’ve also noticed that the larger art prints are more likely to hold onto their “roll memory”. Any print larger than 8x10 is shipped in a tube, so it will have a memory of this roll. Since the fine art prints are a thicker paper, it takes a little longer to flatten out the print and make it ready for framing. (See my article with tips to uncurl your art print here.)

Posters

Posters, on the other hand, are designed for more temporary use and may fade more quickly over time, especially if they’ve been kept in harsh conditions. While you will also get vivid colors and contrast with the poster paper, they are a little less sharp than the fine art prints, but you have to look closely to see the difference. While my printer does offer poster prints as small as 11x14, I wasn’t entirely happy with the sharpness at this size, so I decided to start the smallest poster size at 16x20.

The best thing about the posters is that they are much more affordable. They also flatten out easier than the fine art prints since they’re not as thick and made from a more pliable material. The downside to this, however, is that the paper is more prone to buckling in a frame than the fine art paper. If you’re intending to put your poster in a frame and don’t want this warping effect, consider dry mounting your poster before framing. 

Which choice is right for you?

Ultimately, this decision is up to you depending on your interests, needs and budget. If you’re looking for artwork that you want to have up for years and really enjoy high quality prints, an art print is probably the best way to go. If you’re looking for something more temporary and/or have a tighter budget, then a poster may be a better fit for you. Here’s a quick overview of the pros and cons of both types of artwork.

Art Prints

Pros:

  • high quality fine art paper
  • longer lasting
  • exceptional sharpness
  • vibrant color reproduction

Cons:

  • higher price point, especially at larger sizes
  • paper has a higher roll memory

Posters

Pros:

  • more affordable option
  • flattens out more quickly and easily
  • also vibrant color reproduction

Cons:

  • smallest size starts at 16x20
  • more prone to buckling when framed
  • won't last as long as the archival print